Re: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-15 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 schrieb ext [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So I moved 05compiler out of the way (I want to preserve that time stamp just in case I do need to restore it), ran env-update again, and now lzma is happy. I can run man again! Things which failed emerge now build -- 323 to go.

RE: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-15 Thread Sylvain Chouleur
Another way (simple) to resolve the issue is to re-emerge lzma-utils with nocxx flag Sylvain Chouleur Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:28:10 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9? On Wed, May 14, 2008

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-15 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2008 schrieb ext Sylvain Chouleur: Another way (simple) to resolve the issue is to re-emerge lzma-utils with nocxx flag No. It's just a workaround that works with certain packages, but fails for others (where C++ is not optional). The solution is to fix the broken

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-15 Thread felix
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:31:09AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2008 schrieb ext Sylvain Chouleur: Another way (simple) to resolve the issue is to re-emerge lzma-utils with nocxx flag No. It's just a workaround that works with certain packages, but fails for others

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-14 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 schrieb ext [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The short of it is that a lot of binaries on my system are linked against gcc 3.4.9, even if I remerge them from scratch. There is no such thing as gcc 3.4.9. It happened with gcc 4.2.2, I emerged 4.2.3 and it still happens. The

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-14 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been battling this weirdness for several months, and it has been getting worse and worse. Now I can't even unpack half the man pages. The short of it is that a lot of binaries on my system are linked against gcc 3.4.9, even if I

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-14 Thread felix
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 08:19:38AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: There is no such thing as gcc 3.4.9. You emerged it with 4.2.3, but _at_runtime_ it's trying to get libstdc++ from 4.1.2. Check your environment, especially all variables with PATH in their name (env|grep PATH), as well as

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-14 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Try: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.3 ldd /usr/bin/lzma This works. Good. If this works, try running env-update source /etc/profile, then just ldd /usr/bin/lzma again. Unfortunately, this doesn't work. Did

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-14 Thread felix
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:40:24PM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Did you check /etc/ld.so.conf, maybe 4.1.2 is still listed before 4.2.3? You may also need to clean up /etc/env.d a bit and running gcc-config again afterwards also seems to be a good idea. Thanks. I started looking at it

[gentoo-user] Why does my system still want gcc 3.4.9?

2008-05-13 Thread felix
I have been battling this weirdness for several months, and it has been getting worse and worse. Now I can't even unpack half the man pages. The short of it is that a lot of binaries on my system are linked against gcc 3.4.9, even if I remerge them from scratch. It happened with gcc 4.2.2, I