Re: [gentoo-user] Why is glibc ntpl+nptl-only?

2006-09-16 Thread Jure Varlec
On Friday 15 September 2006 07:07, Wolfgang Liebich wrote: Hi, For my new gentoo system I switched to the latest greatest profile - 2006.1. During the initial installation emerge told me glibc 2.4 is nptlonly - so I turned on the nptl and nptlonly USE flags in make.conf. Now my old linux

Re: [gentoo-user] Why is glibc ntpl+nptl-only?

2006-09-16 Thread Mick
On Saturday 16 September 2006 09:14, Jure Varlec wrote: Well, the new glibc-2.4 only supports nptl, unlike glibc-2.3 which supported both threading models. So if you want legacy linuxthreads, you have to stay with glibc-2.3. As for being better, glibc-2.4 is better than 2.3 IMHO. Also, nptl

Re: [gentoo-user] Why is glibc ntpl+nptl-only?

2006-09-16 Thread Jan-Hendrik Zab
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:49:32 +0100 Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a need for either nptl or nptlonly in our USE flags now that we have moved over to glibc-2.4 (assuming that we do not want linuxthreads anymore)? I currently have nptlonly in my make.conf and was wondering whether I

[gentoo-user] Why is glibc ntpl+nptl-only?

2006-09-14 Thread Wolfgang Liebich
Hi, For my new gentoo system I switched to the latest greatest profile - 2006.1. During the initial installation emerge told me glibc 2.4 is nptlonly - so I turned on the nptl and nptlonly USE flags in make.conf. Now my old linux system (profile 2006.0) tells me the same. Sooo - i guess I would