It seems that this variable is hard-code by gcc.I cannot change it any
more.When I use gcc -m32 to compile a 32bit program,gcc is looking for
/usr/lib rather than /usr/lib32.But in my system,/usr/lib is a symlink to
/usr/lib64.The real 32bit librarys is in /usr/lib32.The linker is always
complainin
I thought LD_LIBRARY_PATH was old skool and now ppl use ldconfig, so man
ldconfig.
LIBRARY_PATH is not LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
2013/8/12 Adam Carter
> I thought LD_LIBRARY_PATH was old skool and now ppl use ldconfig, so man
> ldconfig.
>
2013/8/12 东方巽雷 :
> It seems that this variable is hard-code by gcc.I cannot change it any
> more.When I use gcc -m32 to compile a 32bit program,gcc is looking for
> /usr/lib rather than /usr/lib32.But in my system,/usr/lib is a symlink to
> /usr/lib64.The real 32bit librarys is in /usr/lib32.The li
On 12/08/13 05:49, 东方巽雷 wrote:
It seems that this variable is hard-code by gcc.I cannot change it any
more.When I use gcc -m32 to compile a 32bit program,gcc is looking for
/usr/lib rather than /usr/lib32.But in my system,/usr/lib is a symlink
to /usr/lib64.The real 32bit librarys is in /usr/lib3
I think the gcc version with x32 abi is faster.So I install a x32 version
on amd64.Now I have solved my problem by creating a new gcc specs
file.Thank you all the same.
2013/8/12 Samuli Suominen
> On 12/08/13 05:49, 东方巽雷 wrote:
>
>> It seems that this variable is hard-code by gcc.I cannot chang
6 matches
Mail list logo