Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> Sounds like a forgotten "make mrproper" or "make clean" before a full
> build?
make mrproper wipes .config, so be careful ;)
--
Norberto Bensa
informática BeNSA
4544-9692 / 15-4190-6344
Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
pgpdrFxYPXijB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maxim wexler schreef:
> >>>then ran make modules_install. Did I forget
> >>
> >>something?
> >>
> >>yes you forgot to make the kernel and forgot to
> >>install the kernel and
> >>reboot.
You are right. I had neglected that thing
called 'make'.
>
maxim wexler schreef:
>>>then ran make modules_install. Did I forget
>>
>>something?
>>
>>yes you forgot to make the kernel and forgot to
>>install the kernel and
>>reboot.
>
>
> Didn't forget. Those are obvious steps and not worth mentioning.
>
Everything is worth mentioning when something goe
> > then ran make modules_install. Did I forget
> something?
>
> yes you forgot to make the kernel and forgot to
> install the kernel and
> reboot.
Didn't forget. Those are obvious steps and not worth mentioning.
Start your
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:18:11 +1200
Nick Rout wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
> maxim wexler wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- Michael Crute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > It would appear that it is not. Double check with my
> > > cat grep command and
> > > perhaps recompile
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
maxim wexler wrote:
>
>
> --- Michael Crute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It would appear that it is not. Double check with my
> > cat grep command and
> > perhaps recompile your kernel.
> >
> bash-2.05b$ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep
> CONFIG_
Run a make clean on the kernel source tree and then a make &&
make modules_install and see what happens. Perhaps that will solve it.
-MikeOn 8/2/05, James Hiscock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sounds like a forgotten "make mrproper" or "make> > clean" before a full> > build?>> Aren't they for 2.4
> > Sounds like a forgotten "make mrproper" or "make
> > clean" before a full
> > build?
>
> Aren't they for 2.4.x kernels? I'm using a 2.6.11.
You need to rebuild the kernel proper - it's responsible for loading
and unloading modules. Rebuilding just the modules won't help you.
And no, those ma
--- Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like a forgotten "make mrproper" or "make
> clean" before a full
> build?
Aren't they for 2.4.x kernels? I'm using a 2.6.11.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty
--- Michael Crute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would appear that it is not. Double check with my
> cat grep command and
> perhaps recompile your kernel.
>
bash-2.05b$ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep
CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD
CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
bash-2.05b$
I knew it was there having just
Sounds like a forgotten "make mrproper" or "make clean" before a full
build?
I'm sure the kernel isn't making this stuff up. :D
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, maxim wexler wrote:
Module unloading support is optional. You want to
enable it in your kernel config.
See the start of this thread. It *is*
It would appear that it is not. Double check with my cat grep command and perhaps recompile your kernel.
-MikeOn 8/2/05, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Module unloading support is optional. You want to> enable it in your kernel config.>See the start of this thread. It *is* enabled> Za
> Module unloading support is optional. You want to
> enable it in your kernel config.
>
See the start of this thread. It *is* enabled
> Zac
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the
Maxim:
Try this command `cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep
CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD`. On my machine (which has module unloading
compiled into the kernel) I see CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
-MikeOn 8/2/05, David Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12:36 Tue 02 Aug , maxim wexler wrote:> dayglo root # m
On 12:36 Tue 02 Aug , maxim wexler wrote:
> dayglo root # modprobe -rv fglrx
> rmmod /lib/modules/2.6.11-gentoo-r3/video/fglrx.ko
> FATAL: Error removing fglrx
> (/lib/modules/2.6.11-gentoo-r3/video/fglrx.ko): Kernel
> does not have module unloading support
>
> none the wiser :/
Sounds like y
maxim wexler wrote:
--- Michael Crute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try using 'modprobe -rnv ' and see what
errors you get.
dayglo root # modprobe-rnv fglrx
rmmod /lib/modules/2.6.11-gentoo-r3/video/fglrx.ko
rmmod
/lib/modules/2.6.11-gentoo-r3/kernel/drivers/char/agp/agpgart.ko
dayglo root
--- Michael Crute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try using 'modprobe -rnv ' and see what
> errors you get.
>
dayglo root # modprobe-rnv fglrx
rmmod /lib/modules/2.6.11-gentoo-r3/video/fglrx.ko
rmmod
/lib/modules/2.6.11-gentoo-r3/kernel/drivers/char/agp/agpgart.ko
dayglo root # modprobe fglrx
Try using 'modprobe -rnv ' and see what errors you get.
-MikeOn 8/2/05, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everyone,The ATI FAQ recommends compiling module unloading intothe kernel, which I did.Then I tried modprobing the various requisite modulesto see what would work, fglrx, radeon,
Hello everyone,
The ATI FAQ recommends compiling module unloading into
the kernel, which I did.
Then I tried modprobing the various requisite modules
to see what would work, fglrx, radeon, nvidia-agp etc.
But I found I couldn't rmmod anything; got FATAL,
Module unloading unavailable(something li
19 matches
Mail list logo
