Re: [gentoo-user] depclean screw up

2006-07-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:29:06 -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > If you run > > emerge -av --noreplace > > on all the packages that > > emerge -av --depclean > > wants to clean, then depclean will no longer complain. This is equivalent to fixing low oil pressure in y

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean screw up

2006-07-30 Thread Richard Fish
On 7/30/06, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ha! Got it! Yep, that is definitely "wacky". I would suggest to re-open this bug and add your results to it: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67179 -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean screw up

2006-07-30 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:57, Richard Fish wrote: > Well I don't see anything obviously wrong.  I would probably take a > look at the output of > "emerge --debug --depclean --pretend world", and look for > net-libs/libsoup or gnome-base/gail.  Both of them should appear as > dependancies of somethi

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean screw up

2006-07-30 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 30 July 2006 03:27, Richard Fish wrote: > But depclean wants to remove gnome-libs also, so this doesn't count... Yep, bad example. I've got rid of both gnome-libs and imlib. > > That one I saw, and it did add to the confusion. > > libsoup does depend on gnutls, and gtkhtml depends on li

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean screw up

2006-07-29 Thread Vladimir G. Ivanovic
If you run emerge -av --noreplace on all the packages that emerge -av --depclean wants to clean, then depclean will no longer complain. --- Vladimir -- Vladimir G. Ivanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean screw up

2006-07-29 Thread Richard Fish
On 7/29/06, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: gnome-libs does directly depend on imlib though. But depclean wants to remove gnome-libs also, so this doesn't count... That one I saw, and it did add to the confusion. libsoup does depend on gnutls, and gtkhtml depends on libsoup, and dvdr

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean screw up

2006-07-29 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 30 July 2006 01:05, Richard Fish wrote: > > But, basically, depclean wants to remove packages that equery says have > > direct dependencies. > > equery depends is unfortunately broken.  It does not consider use flag > dependancies. Ahh, now that I didn't know. > Examples from your list:

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean screw up

2006-07-29 Thread Richard Fish
On 7/29/06, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Check out this wackiness from depclean. This has had me stumped all day, no matter how many merges, depcleans, revdep-rebuilds I try. It's long... But, basically, depclean wants to remove packages that equery says have direct dependencie

[gentoo-user] depclean screw up

2006-07-29 Thread Mike Williams
Hi, Check out this wackiness from depclean. This has had me stumped all day, no matter how many merges, depcleans, revdep-rebuilds I try. It's long... But, basically, depclean wants to remove packages that equery says have direct dependencies. If I merge all the packages that directly depend o