On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:12:02PM -0400, John Covici wrote
>
> I wonder why they are doing this, I find the single file much easier
> to deal with and its easier to make sure I don't have duplicate
> entries this way.
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use (giggle)
--
Walter Dnes
I don't
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 12:12:02 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> > The devs are deprecating the flat-file version of package.*, I
> > have been gettings warnings during emerges indicating that they
> > all need to be changed to the directory layout.
> >
> > If you ignore this eventually emerge will stop
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:23:28 -0400,
Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> On 4/18/20 10:56 AM, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I /thought/ that /etc/portage/package.mask is a file and using it
> > in this manner works as exspected.
> > Also the docs are of that opinion, too:
> >
On 4/18/20 10:56 AM, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
Hi,
I /thought/ that /etc/portage/package.mask is a file and using it
in this manner works as exspected.
Also the docs are of that opinion, too:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/package.mask
BUT!
* error: please convert
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 19:56:19 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> I /thought/ that /etc/portage/package.mask is a file and using it
> in this manner works as exspected.
> Also the docs are of that opinion, too:
Are they> From man portage:
/etc/portage/
Files in this directory including
Hi,
I /thought/ that /etc/portage/package.mask is a file and using it
in this manner works as exspected.
Also the docs are of that opinion, too:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/package.mask
BUT!
host:/root>crossdev -t arm-none-eabi
-
6 matches
Mail list logo
