On 8/22/09, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here.
>
> Something must have been funny. My system is stable and it did ask for
> firefox 3.5 (as I showed in my original post). However, the problem has
> disappeared with today's sync. Apparen
At Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:52:31 -0700 Keith Dart wrote:
> === On Fri, 08/21, Beau Henderson wrote: ===
>> Not if your @stable.
>
> ===
>
> But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here.
Something must have been funny. My system is stable and it did ask for
firefox 3.5 (as I
=== On Fri, 08/21, Beau Henderson wrote: ===
> Not if your @stable.
===
But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here.
-- Keith Dart
--
--
Keith Dart
===
Keith Dart wrote:
=== On Thu, 08/20, Allan Gottlieb wrote: ===
=net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0* required by ('installed', '/',
'www-client/epiphany-2.24.3-r10', 'nomerge')
===
The latest version of epiphany is 2.26.3. try unmerging your epiphany
first.
-- Keith Dart
Not if your @stable.
I'
=== On Thu, 08/20, Allan Gottlieb wrote: ===
>=net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0* required by ('installed', '/',
> 'www-client/epiphany-2.24.3-r10', 'nomerge')
===
The latest version of epiphany is 2.26.3. try unmerging your epiphany
first.
-- Keith Dart
--
--
Keith Dart
I have had both epiphany and firefox on my machine for quite a while,
but the latest stable of each are now "incompatible".
Specifically they require incompatible versions of xulrunner.
Is there a reason why epiphany cannot use xulrunner-1.9-1?
thanks,
allan
=
6 matches
Mail list logo
