Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sunday 22 August 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010, > > > > cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: > > > > There is a way to downgrade for the brave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > quickpkg glibc >

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:44 on Sunday 22 August 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010, > > > > cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: > > > > There is a way to downgrade for the brave. >

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread covici
Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010, > cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: > > > > There is a way to downgrade for the brave. > > > > > > > > > > > > quickpkg glibc > > > move the 2.11.? version ebuild you want to your local overlay. > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: > > There is a way to downgrade for the brave. > > > > > > > > quickpkg glibc > > move the 2.11.? version ebuild you want to your local overlay. > > Edit it and find the check that disallows d

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread covici
Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 15:29 on Sunday 22 August 2010, Arttu V. did > opine thusly: > > > On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged -- > > > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:29 on Sunday 22 August 2010, Arttu V. did opine thusly: > On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged -- > > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however > > after doing t

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread covici
Arttu V. wrote: > On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged -- > > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however > > after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to > > S_ISCHR. I tri

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread Arttu V.
On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged -- > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however > after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to > S_ISCHR. I tried to downgrade glibc, but a

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread Alex Schuster
cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged -- > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however > after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to > S_ISCHR. I tried to downgrade glibc, but apparently t

[gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly

2010-08-22 Thread covici
Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged -- amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to S_ISCHR. I tried to downgrade glibc, but apparently this is not supported and I am a bit stu