Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
> Without any ranting ... I feel kind of stupid waiting for GNOME 2.26
> going stable within the gentoo-tree while GNOME 2.28 is out now at
> gnome.org.
>
> Maybe I am too conservative here and could already use 2.26 for a while
> by unmasking lots of packages or doin
Keith Dart schrieb:
> Just FYI, I always run unstable (now ~amd64), and rarely have problems,
> and those are mostly compile problems related to my particular mix of
> USE flags. Those are quickly fixed. Once running, everything has been
> stable for me. I guess that since "unstable" is so stable
=== On Wed, 09/30, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: ===
> Without any ranting ... I feel kind of stupid waiting for GNOME 2.26
> going stable within the gentoo-tree while GNOME 2.28 is out now at
> gnome.org.
===
Just FYI, I always run unstable (now ~amd64), and rarely have problems,
and those are mos
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 00:01 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Without any ranting ... I feel kind of stupid waiting for GNOME 2.26
> going stable within the gentoo-tree while GNOME 2.28 is out now at
> gnome.org.
>
> Maybe I am too conservative here and could already use 2.26 for a while
> by
Without any ranting ... I feel kind of stupid waiting for GNOME 2.26
going stable within the gentoo-tree while GNOME 2.28 is out now at
gnome.org.
Maybe I am too conservative here and could already use 2.26 for a while
by unmasking lots of packages or doing *something* ...
Not that I really miss
5 matches
Mail list logo