Mrugesh Karnik wrote:
On Friday 16 December 2005 18:55, Dale wrote:
This is funny. I have gnome-vfs installed and KDE 3.5 with the new
hal. I wonder why it worked for me?
Dale
I had to emerge >gnome-vfs-2.12* with KDE 3.5 and >hal-0.5*
Mrugesh
I think you are right. Maybe th
On Friday 16 December 2005 18:55, Dale wrote:
> This is funny. I have gnome-vfs installed and KDE 3.5 with the new
> hal. I wonder why it worked for me?
>
> Dale
I had to emerge >gnome-vfs-2.12* with KDE 3.5 and >hal-0.5*
Mrugesh
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Glenn Enright wrote:
On Friday 16 December 2005 10:24, Richard Fish wrote:
Since you do not use gnome, you probably don't care whether gnome-vfs
supports hal or not:
echo "gnome-base/gnome-vfs -hal" >>/etc/portage/package.use
-Richard
Of course! :) Simple elegant fix. Thanks for you
On Friday 16 December 2005 10:24, Richard Fish wrote:
> Since you do not use gnome, you probably don't care whether gnome-vfs
> supports hal or not:
>
> echo "gnome-base/gnome-vfs -hal" >>/etc/portage/package.use
>
> -Richard
Of course! :) Simple elegant fix. Thanks for your insight.
--
[Lois' s
On 12/15/05, Glenn Enright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed kde3.5 which is great, but to do soI had to unmask some packages,
> including hal. So I have version 0.5.5.1 installed.
>
> Unfortunately I also have gnome-light installed, which requires hal-0.4 for
> gnome-vfs. Any ideas on how I
I installed kde3.5 which is great, but to do soI had to unmask some packages,
including hal. So I have version 0.5.5.1 installed.
Unfortunately I also have gnome-light installed, which requires hal-0.4 for
gnome-vfs. Any ideas on how I might solve this conflict. I dont really need
gnome, but it
6 matches
Mail list logo
