I'll assume for the moment that the hardened-sources patch set
discussed includes security improvements.
My question is...what kinds? For what reason is there a set of "makes
it more secure" patches that aren't integrated into the mainline
kernel? Are they just not stable in some fashion? Do they
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> I'll assume for the moment that the hardened-sources patch set
> discussed includes security improvements.
>
> My question is...what kinds? For what reason is there a set of "makes
> it more secure" patches that aren't integrated into the mainl
El 22/09/11 22:20, Michael Mol escribió:
> My question is...what kinds?
Well mainly the PaX and the grsecurity patches. I also heard there is a
WIP in bringing RSBAC back again too.
> For what reason is there a set of "makes
> it more secure" patches that aren't integrated into the mainline
> ker
On 9/22/2011 5:51 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
(klondike) wrote:
El 22/09/11 22:20, Michael Mol escribió:
My question is...what kinds?
Well mainly the PaX and the grsecurity patches. I also heard there is a
WIP in bringing RSBAC back again too.
Does gentoo-sources include the SELinux
El 23/09/11 01:02, Mike Edenfield escribió:
> On 9/22/2011 5:51 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
>> El 22/09/11 22:20, Michael Mol escribió:
>>> My question is...what kinds?
>
>> Well mainly the PaX and the grsecurity patches. I also heard there is a
>> WIP in bringing RSBAC ba
5 matches
Mail list logo