On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:18:59 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > Incidentally, unless you are a developer, you don't normally need
> > the doc use flag.
>
> OK, thanks for the advise -- I wish there were a devel-doc flag to
> distinguish between use and development docs, but I guess you can't
> have
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:53:48 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > I am using the gnome overlay from layman.
>
> It might have been helpful to menyion that :(
>
> > If I comment out the source line for layman in /etc/make.conf I ge
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:53:48 -0400, John covici wrote:
> I am using the gnome overlay from layman.
It might have been helpful to menyion that :(
> If I comment out the source line for layman in /etc/make.conf I get
> the following:
>
>
>
> [nomerge ] gnome-base/gnome-2.26.3 [2.26.2]
> [
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:31:41 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > (dependency required by "sys-apps/devicekit-power-010" [ebuild])
> > (dependency required by
> > "gnome-extra/gnome-power-manager-2.26.3" [ebuild])
>
> Neither of thes
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:31:41 -0400, John covici wrote:
> (dependency required by "sys-apps/devicekit-power-010" [ebuild])
> (dependency required by
> "gnome-extra/gnome-power-manager-2.26.3" [ebuild])
Neither of these are in portage. Which overlay are you using for them?
--
Neil Bothwick
PC DO
On Sunday 02 August 2009 13:31:41 John covici wrote:
> on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
>
> > On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:46 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > > > run the emerge with the -t option to see what is pulling in
> > > > udev-
> > >
> > > I get the same thi
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:46 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > > run the emerge with the -t option to see what is pulling in
> > > udev-
> >
> > I get the same thing if I emerge udev145, so its not unique to 999.
>
> Tha
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:46 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > run the emerge with the -t option to see what is pulling in
> > udev-
>
> I get the same thing if I emerge udev145, so its not unique to 999.
That's because both are masked, it doesn't have any bearing on the reason
for udev-
On Sunday 02 August 2009 10:45:46 John covici wrote:
> on Sunday 08/02/2009 Alan McKinnon(alan.mckin...@gmail.com) wrote
>
> > On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:59:22 John covici wrote:
> > > Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
> > > ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Alan McKinnon(alan.mckin...@gmail.com) wrote
> On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:59:22 John covici wrote:
> > Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
> > ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-fs/udev-145[extras]" have been
> > masked.
> > !!! One of t
On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:59:22 John covici wrote:
> Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
> ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-fs/udev-145[extras]" have been
> masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> request:
> - sys-fs/ud
Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-fs/udev-145[extras]" have been
masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- sys-fs/udev- (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
/usr/portage/p
12 matches
Mail list logo
