Re: [gentoo-user] leafnode and xinetd?

2011-05-19 Thread Paul Colquhoun
On Wed, 18 May 2011 21:33:58 Indi wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:10:02AM +0200, Indi wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:20:01PM +0200, James Cloos wrote: > > > > "I" == Indi writes: > > > Leafnode works fine here. > > > > > > I> Output of xinetd -d > > > > > > Looks fine. > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] leafnode and xinetd?

2011-05-18 Thread Indi
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:10:02AM +0200, Indi wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:20:01PM +0200, James Cloos wrote: > > > "I" == Indi writes: > > > > Leafnode works fine here. > > > > I> Output of xinetd -d > > > > Looks fine. > > > > In addition to the other reply's suggestions, does ru

Re: [gentoo-user] leafnode and xinetd?

2011-05-18 Thread Indi
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:20:01PM +0200, James Cloos wrote: > > "I" == Indi writes: > > Leafnode works fine here. > > I> Output of xinetd -d > > Looks fine. > > In addition to the other reply's suggestions, does running > /usr/sbin/leafnode from a root shell work? > > Have you run fetch

Re: [gentoo-user] leafnode and xinetd?

2011-05-17 Thread James Cloos
> "I" == Indi writes: Leafnode works fine here. I> Output of xinetd -d Looks fine. In addition to the other reply's suggestions, does running /usr/sbin/leafnode from a root shell work? Have you run fetchnews at least once? -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

Re: [gentoo-user] leafnode and xinetd?

2011-05-15 Thread Adam Carter
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Indi wrote: > Anyone here have leafnode running successfully? > I seem to be stuck, and for some reason google appears to be stuck as > well on this one. Apparently users who want leafnode are about as rare > as hen's teeth... > > 11/5/15@10:24:49: ERROR: 3486

[gentoo-user] leafnode and xinetd?

2011-05-15 Thread Indi
Anyone here have leafnode running successfully? I seem to be stuck, and for some reason google appears to be stuck as well on this one. Apparently users who want leafnode are about as rare as hen's teeth... Output of xinetd -d follows: idd@gh:[~]$ xinetd -d 11/5/15@10:24:49: DEBUG: 3486 {