> > This sort of error is often fixed by re-emerging openjade.
> I've re emerged jadetex openjade, but still have the same
> problem. I can
> masked it temporaly in /etc/portage/package.use, Thanks!
I also tried re-emerging openjade with no result. I re-emerged an sgml
package and that fixed it.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Hello Dale,
>
>
>>> Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package,
>>> you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation,
>>> not the standard man/info pages.
>>>
>
>
>> Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:10:26 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > You could set it in /etc/portage/package.use for individual packages
> > as they come up for upgrade, then change it globally and rebuild when
> > you have the time. It's not as though the system can't be used while
> > emerging and
On Saturday 06 October 2007 21:01:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package,
> > > you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation,
> > > not the standard man/info pages.
> >
> > It was a mistake when I started use gentoo at
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:32:31 Dale wrote:
> > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you
> > normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the
> > standard man/info pages.
>
> Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my
Hello Dale,
> > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package,
> > you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation,
> > not the standard man/info pages.
> Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my USE line
> and I thought it was for t
Hello Wang, Baojun,
> > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package,
> > you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation,
> > not the standard man/info pages.
> It was a mistake when I started use gentoo at the very beginning, now
> if I remove the "doc
On Saturday 06 October 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Hello Wang, Baojun,
>
> > I've got the following error while upgrade libusb from libusb-0.12 to
> > libusb-0.12-r1 failed with USE flag "doc", it will be ok with "-doc":
>
> Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you
> normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the
> standard man/info pages.
>
>
Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my USE line
and I thought it wa
Hello Wang, Baojun,
> I've got the following error while upgrade libusb from libusb-0.12 to
> libusb-0.12-r1 failed with USE flag "doc", it will be ok with "-doc":
Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you
normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentat
10 matches
Mail list logo
