[gentoo-user] linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-04 Thread David Relson
Today when I ran "emerge -au world" I was surprised to see Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ] sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.17-r2 [2.6.17-r1] because I'm presently running a 2.6.19-gentoo-r2 kernel (built from gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r1 using genkernel). When I run "emerge -C linux-

Re: [gentoo-user] linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-04 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 01:53, David Relson wrote: > Today when I ran "emerge -au world" I was surprised to see > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild U ] sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.17-r2 [2.6.17-r1] > > because I'm presently running a 2.6.19-gentoo-r2 kernel (built from > gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-04 Thread Statux
The old way of doing things was to make the following two symlinks: /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux/include/linux /usr/include/asm -> /usr/src/linux/include/asm Then the second would be linked to the correct set of asm headers for your architecture, etc, inside the linux kernel source tree

Re: [gentoo-user] linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-04 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 02:23, Statux wrote: > The old way of doing things was to make the following two symlinks: > > /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux/include/linux > /usr/include/asm -> /usr/src/linux/include/asm > > Then the second would be linked to the correct set of asm headers for

Re: [gentoo-user] linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-04 Thread David Relson
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:23:49 -0500 Statux wrote: > The old way of doing things was to make the following two symlinks: > > /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux/include/linux > /usr/include/asm -> /usr/src/linux/include/asm > > Then the second would be linked to the correct set of asm headers f

Re: [gentoo-user] linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-04 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 02:42, David Relson wrote: > On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:23:49 -0500 > > Statux wrote: > > The old way of doing things was to make the following two symlinks: > > > > /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux/include/linux > > /usr/include/asm -> /usr/src/linux/include/asm > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-04 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 02:42, David Relson wrote: > It's interesting to compare the keywords of > Linux-headers-2.6.19.ebuild, i.e. "-*", to gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r1 > which has "~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86".  If I'm interpreting these > correction, gentoo-sources is available but unstable

Re: [gentoo-user] linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-04 Thread David Relson
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 03:07:11 +0100 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 02:42, David Relson wrote: > > It's interesting to compare the keywords of > > Linux-headers-2.6.19.ebuild, i.e. "-*", to gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r1 > > which has "~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86".  If I'm inter

Re: [gentoo-user] linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-05 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:42:38 -0500, David Relson wrote: > Interesting. At the moment emerge is updating my linux-headers from > 2.6.17-r1 to 2.6.17-r2. The first step is downloading > linux-2.6.17.tar.bz2 which, at 41MB, seems more like a complete kernel > source tree than just the headers. Over