Re: [gentoo-user] low risk network bridge

2015-05-07 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
On 06.05.2015 23:14, Poison BL. wrote: If you need the VMs outwardly visible, I can't think of a way to do it without losing connection upon switching to the bridge (granted, I'm far from an expert on bridging under linux). If you're fine with the VMs being behind a NAT, and your kernel has

Re: [gentoo-user] low risk network bridge

2015-05-07 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
On 07.05.2015 13:21, R0b0t1 wrote: Unfortunately I don't think this produces VM interfaces that are visible outside of the subnet. I made some live changes a while ago (and need to figure out what they were - probably routing stuff). In any case, you should be able to create the tap devices

Re: [gentoo-user] low risk network bridge

2015-05-07 Thread R0b0t1
# ip link 3: enp2s0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP 5: tap0: NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP 6: tap1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP 7: br0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP,LOWER_UP Assign what was the host machine's IP to br0. The guests on tap0 and tap1 should have IP addresses different

Re: [gentoo-user] low risk network bridge

2015-05-06 Thread Poison BL.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: My task is to enable a (remote) server to run VMs via qemu/KVM. The server is configured to set up its eth0 via openrc but this isn't enough to run the VMs network. I tried macvtap but something didn't work, either

[gentoo-user] low risk network bridge

2015-05-06 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
My task is to enable a (remote) server to run VMs via qemu/KVM. The server is configured to set up its eth0 via openrc but this isn't enough to run the VMs network. I tried macvtap but something didn't work, either libvirt (yes, with USE-flag macvtap) or something else (the kernel supports