Re: [gentoo-user] lumina

2017-04-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:37:36 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > It seems fairly clear, some .desktop files contain invalid values. It > > shouldn't stop them working but they should have been fixed before > > being installed. > > > Is it an upstream problem, then? Should I file a bug? It's a QA re

Re: [gentoo-user] lumina

2017-04-10 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:43:20 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > It seems fairly clear, some .desktop files contain invalid values. It > shouldn't stop them working but they should have been fixed before being > installed. > Is it an upstream

Re: [gentoo-user] lumina

2017-04-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:43:20 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > * QA Notice: This package installs one or more .desktop files that do not > * pass validation. > * It's a QA notice, you can ignore it. Whoever committed the ebuild should not have done so. > * /usr/share/applications/lumina-con

[gentoo-user] lumina

2017-04-10 Thread Jorge Almeida
* QA Notice: This package installs one or more .desktop files that do not * pass validation. * * /usr/share/applications/lumina-config.desktop: error: value "Lumina;" for key "OnlyShowIn" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an unregistered value "Lumina"; values extending the format should s