On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Stroller wrote:
> > Of course, this does not detect a succesful, but somehow corrupted,
> > copy
> > (which should be exceptionally rare, anyway).
>
> Well perhaps I'm just being paranoid today.
> But how do I know that a successful, but somehow corrupted, copy has
>
On 26 Feb 2008, at 19:51, Stroller wrote:
Thanks. I think this has been suggested before for my backups - IIRC
it has a useful --ignore-path or --exclude-path command which can
insure you all the users' Documents & Settings, without the useless
temp & "Temporary Internet Files".
rsync
On 24 Feb 2008, at 19:46, Christopher Copeland wrote:
On 24 Feb 2008, at 06:06, Stroller wrote:
So my question is:
Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to
be sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them have
become damaged during transfer? I'm thinking
On 24 Feb 2008, at 11:46, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Stroller wrote:
I've done this loads in the past, and never been aware of any file
corruption, but I guess I'm just paranoid today. Perhaps I shouldn't
use the -v flags during my copy - it's reassuring to see the files
On 24 Feb 2008, at 06:06, Stroller wrote:
So my question is:
Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to be
sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them have become
damaged during transfer? I'm thinking of something like md5sum for
directories.
I use rsy
Hi!
=== On Sunday 24 February 2008, you wrote: ===
...
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:06:10 +, Stroller wrote:
> > > Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to
> > > be sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them have
> > > become damaged during transfer? I
Am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2008 schrieb cabbage:
> diff can use for binary files ?
If you just want to know "different or not", sure.
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
diff can use for binary files ?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:06:10 +, Stroller wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to be
> > sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them ha
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:06:10 +, Stroller wrote:
> Is there any way to check the integrity of copied directories, to be
> sure that none of the files or sub-directories in them have become
> damaged during transfer? I'm thinking of something like md5sum for
> directories.
Diff?
diff -r
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Stroller wrote:
> I've done this loads in the past, and never been aware of any file
> corruption, but I guess I'm just paranoid today. Perhaps I shouldn't
> use the -v flags during my copy - it's reassuring to see the files
> being copied, but what if I overlooked a bu
Hi there,
I'm in the habit of backing up customer data by booting from knoppix,
connecting a portable hard-drive and copying with `cp -rvf`.
When this has finished I connect the portable hard-drive to my
desktop machine, copy the directory of data from it to my homedir,
and make a zip fil
11 matches
Mail list logo
