On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:41:33PM -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote
> hohndel doesn't specify any options, just says, use ext2. What does
> the group recommend?
This is in the context of "cheap SSD" diask drives. They behave
differently from hard disks, so "everything you know is wrong" if you
try st
>
> ext2 is normally recommended for "cheap" SSDs such as are in the EEE
> because it is a non-journalled FS, which is kind of important when your
> disk has severely limited write life.
It's not just the write life I'm worried about; it's booting into a
system whose partitions no longer line up,
Maxim Wexler wrote:
Hi group,
More and more I'm coming across references to "cheap" ssds in the EEEs.
http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/eeepc/best-filesystem-choice-for-the-eeepc/
recommends ext2. Which I found surprising, but the guy seems knowlegeable.
Here is Theodore T'so:
# mke2fs
Hi group,
More and more I'm coming across references to "cheap" ssds in the EEEs.
http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/eeepc/best-filesystem-choice-for-the-eeepc/
recommends ext2. Which I found surprising, but the guy seems knowlegeable.
Here is Theodore T'so:
# mke2fs -t ext4 -E stripe-wid
4 matches
Mail list logo
