On Thursday 23 April 2009 07:43:20 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> I think the MAKEOPTS was not the problem, but only the make prepare... I
> remember to see before that "sometimes", the kernel source tree is no
> more up-to-date with the last kernel build, so when i see that problems,
> the first thing t
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:04:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 23:45:19 Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:30:27 Xavier Parizet wrote:
>> > Can you repost emerge output using MAKEOPTS="-j1" to see what make
>> > command is launched.
>> > Try also to run m
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 23:45:19 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:30:27 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> > Can you repost emerge output using MAKEOPTS="-j1" to see what make
> > command is launched.
> > Try also to run make prepare in your kernel source tree before.
>
> # cd /usr/src
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:30:27 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> Can you repost emerge output using MAKEOPTS="-j1" to see what make
> command is launched.
> Try also to run make prepare in your kernel source tree before.
# cd /usr/src/linux
# make prepare
# MAKEOPTS="-j1" emerge nvidia-drivers
This t
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:34:34 +0100, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:23:34 Xavier Parizet wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
>> >> I think the problem is from the SYSSRC make par
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 08:49:19 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> In fact you're right, it seems that my webmail (Roundcube) add the
> skins/default part i saw earlier in your first post... Looking at the
> mail source and there is no skins/default part.
> Apologize :)
Thanks. You had me worried for a w
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:34:34 +0100, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:23:34 Xavier Parizet wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
>> >> I think the problem is from the SYSSRC make par
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
>
>> I've read the post backwards and forwards, and I've had kmail search
>> case-insensitively for "skin", and it isn't there. It wasn't there when I
>> sent it, anyway, and grep says it isn't in the files I've atta
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> I've read the post backwards and forwards, and I've had kmail search
> case-insensitively for "skin", and it isn't there. It wasn't there when I
> sent it, anyway, and grep says it isn't in the files I've attached this
> time either.
As a t
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:23:34 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> >> I think the problem is from the SYSSRC make paremeter which is set to
> >> skins/default/usr/src/linux, which see
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
>
>> I think the problem is from the SYSSRC make paremeter which is set to
>> skins/default/usr/src/linux, which seems to be invalid.
>
> Where did you get the "skins" part of that
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 12:21:52 Justin wrote:
> Xavier Parizet schrieb:
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:57:04 +0200, Justin wrote:
> >>
> >> Which kernel du you use?
> >
> > It seems to be 2.6.29-r1 according to SYSOUT content in the portage
> > output...
>
> Yeah that why I am asking, I had an issue
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> I think the problem is from the SYSSRC make paremeter which is set to
> skins/default/usr/src/linux, which seems to be invalid.
Where did you get the "skins" part of that? It isn't in what I posted.
> Maybe you can check to your environme
Xavier Parizet schrieb:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:57:04 +0200, Justin wrote:
>> Peter Humphrey schrieb:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
>>> this:
>>>
>> Compiling source
>>> in
>>>
> /tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.51
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:57:04 +0200, Justin wrote:
> Peter Humphrey schrieb:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
>> this:
>>
> Compiling source
>> in
>>
/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.51/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.51-pk
Peter Humphrey schrieb:
> Hello list,
>
> My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
> this:
>
Compiling source
> in
> /tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.51/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.51-pkg2
> ...
> * Preparing nvidia module
> make -j3 -s HOSTCC=
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:48:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
> this:
>
Compiling source
> in
>
/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.51/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.51-pkg2
> ...
> * Preparing nv
Hello list,
My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
this:
>>> Compiling source
in
/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.51/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.51-pkg2
...
* Preparing nvidia module
make -j3 -s HOSTCC=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64
18 matches
Mail list logo
