On 9/10/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:50:24 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> >Thanks. That seems to work and is indeed a much better place to put
> > it. I did not see that in the man pages (is it there?) so I appreciate
> > the pointer.
>
> It's buried in
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:50:24 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>Thanks. That seems to work and is indeed a much better place to put
> it. I did not see that in the man pages (is it there?) so I appreciate
> the pointer.
It's buried in the portage man page. Basically, what you put
in /etc/portage/prof
On 9/10/05, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10 Sep 2005, at 16:15, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >Generic question - why is package.provided located in
> > /etc/make.profile instead of in /etc/portage? Won't l lose my edits
> > when profile changes come along?
> >
> >It seem
On 10 Sep 2005, at 16:15, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
Generic question - why is package.provided located in
/etc/make.profile instead of in /etc/portage? Won't l lose my edits
when profile changes come along?
It seems to me that if I take responsibility for a package, such as
jack-audio-conne
Hi,
Generic question - why is package.provided located in
/etc/make.profile instead of in /etc/portage? Won't l lose my edits
when profile changes come along?
It seems to me that if I take responsibility for a package, such as
jack-audio-connection-kit, that I wouldn't want the system to tak
5 matches
Mail list logo
