Hi group,
At tail of emerge --sync its says now emerge portage.
So, emerge portage results in one package being
installed, portage, 61kb.
emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus
portage, 18Mb.
Went ahead and just did the one package, figuring
later I could do an emerge -u for the rest o
Hello Maxim
On 15:46 Mon 16 Jul, maxim wexler wrote:
> At tail of emerge --sync its says now emerge portage.
Yes, it does that every time there is a new portage version available.
> emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus
> portage, 18Mb.
from the emerge manpage:
"--update (-u)
maxim wexler wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> At tail of emerge --sync its says now emerge portage.
>
> So, emerge portage results in one package being
> installed, portage, 61kb.
>
> emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus
> portage, 18Mb.
Can you tell us the list of packages it reported?
(downg
>
> Can you tell us the list of packages it reported?
> (downgrade and run emerge -u again).
No, I didn't scroll and paste the output :(
How do I "downgrade"? emerge -pC gives me an ugly
warning.
Can't see it man or --help.
Maxim
__
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 00:46:08 maxim wexler wrote:
> So, emerge portage results in one package being
> installed, portage, 61kb.
>
> emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus
> portage, 18Mb.
>
> Went ahead and just did the one package, figuring
> later I could do an emerge -u for the rest
On 8/5/07, Tim Allingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:32 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 July 2007 00:46:08 maxim wexler wrote:
> > > So, emerge portage results in one package being
> > > installed, portage, 61kb.
> > >
> > > emerge -u portage lines up
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:32 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2007 00:46:08 maxim wexler wrote:
> > So, emerge portage results in one package being
> > installed, portage, 61kb.
> >
> > emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus
> > portage, 18Mb.
> >
> > Went ahead and jus
On Sunday 05 August 2007 17:13:46 Tim Allingham wrote:
> > Because --update stops calculating deps when none of the specified
> > targets need updating. Only --deep checks the consistency of all
> > dependencies even when none of the targets need updating. You could argue
> > it's a deficiency in p
Bo Ørsted Andresen escribió:
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 00:46:08 maxim wexler wrote:
So, emerge portage results in one package being
installed, portage, 61kb.
emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus
portage, 18Mb.
Went ahead and just did the one package, figuring
later I could do an em
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:45:25 +0200, Abraham Marín Pérez wrote:
> Now think there's a new version available of LIB, let's say version
> 2.1, but the latest version of APP is still 1.0. If portage performed a
> deep update by default LIB would be rebuilt, but no APP, what would
> cause broken depend
Neil Bothwick escribió:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:45:25 +0200, Abraham Marín Pérez wrote:
Now think there's a new version available of LIB, let's say version
2.1, but the latest version of APP is still 1.0. If portage performed a
deep update by default LIB would be rebuilt, but no APP, what wou
11 matches
Mail list logo
