Re: [gentoo-user] post-tetex?

2006-05-30 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: On 5/30/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone has any idea about what will be the gentoo way to cope with the no-more-tetex issue? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615/match=gentoo+dev+tetex Thanks, Daniel and B

Re: [gentoo-user] post-tetex?

2006-05-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 5/30/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone has any idea about what will be the gentoo way to cope with the no-more-tetex issue? Have a look on http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615/match=gentoo+dev+tetex -- Beber -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] post-tetex?

2006-05-30 Thread Daniel Waeber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jorge Almeida wrote: > Anyone has any idea about what will be the gentoo way to cope with the > no-more-tetex issue? > There was a discussion about it a some days ago in the dev-list: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615 -BEGIN

[gentoo-user] post-tetex?

2006-05-30 Thread Jorge Almeida
Anyone has any idea about what will be the gentoo way to cope with the no-more-tetex issue? -- Jorge Almeida -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list