OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
It opened my usual spreadsheets & word-processing files correctly,
but the toolbar needs attention tomorrow. Download is 346 MB .
Does anyone know why i
081019 Philip Webb wrote:
> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
> but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
Sorry, that's >= 5,3 GB ... (red face)
--
,,
SUPPORT
Philip Webb wrote:
> 081019 Philip Webb wrote:
>
>> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
>> but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
>>
>
> Sorry, that's >= 5,3 GB ... (red face)
>
>
Don't worry, we knew that was a boo
On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote:
> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
> but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
> It opened my usual spreadsheets & word-processing files correctly,
> but the toolbar needs atte
on 2008-10-19 at 01:25 Philip Webb wrote:
>Dillo 2.0 has been announced:
well, _that_ is good news.
visiting the dillo home page (http://www.dillo.org/) i see that dillo
2.0 has been released, and there's even something about 2.1 in the
changelog. would it be too difficult to update the ebuild?
081019 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote:
>> Does anyone know why it wants 'xulrunner', which is not a use flag here ?
> It's this [details snipped: thanks]:
> So basically it is dependant on the nsplugin USE flag
> and will look for xulrunner or seamonkey
On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:52:24 Philip Webb wrote:
> 081019 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote:
> >> Does anyone know why it wants 'xulrunner', which is not a use flag here
> >> ?
> >
> > It's this [details snipped: thanks]:
> > So basically it is depen
Philip Webb schrieb:
> 081019 Philip Webb wrote:
>
>> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
>> but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
>>
>
> Sorry, that's >= 5,3 GB ... (red face)
>
>
Thanks for that info. Than I will h
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> It's an office suite - I use it mostly to read documents other people
> send me, and because antiword is a little too minimal.
I'm happy with abiword for word processing and gnumeric for
spreadsheet stuff.
--
Walter Dnes <[EMAIL
On Monday 20 October 2008 12:26:11 Erik Hahn wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > For probably the first time ever, I just had a look at that. And I'm
> > asking myself - why does OOo have nsplugins support at all?
> >
> > It's an office suite - I use it mostl
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> For probably the first time ever, I just had a look at that. And I'm asking
> myself - why does OOo have nsplugins support at all?
>
> It's an office suite - I use it mostly to read documents other people send
> me,
> and because
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2008 12:26:11 Erik Hahn wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > For probably the first time ever, I just had a look at that. And I'm
> > > asking myself - why does OOo have
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:52:24 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> Thanks: Xulrunner is a big pkg in itself, but it seems unavoidable.
It is entirely avoidable, by setting USE="-nsplugins". If you want to
view documents in Firefox, you would already have xulrunner installed, so
there's no problem there eit
13 matches
Mail list logo
