Re: [gentoo-user] skype package changes I don't understand

2012-05-21 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 10:54:08 schrieb Mark Knecht: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Markos Chandras > wrote: > > >> if you use testing, you have to deal with such kind of situations. > >> Using a known broken version is just stupid. There isn't a choice > >> between those two. There is on

Re: [gentoo-user] skype package changes I don't understand

2012-05-21 Thread Mark Knecht
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> if you use testing, you have to deal with such kind of situations. >> Using a known broken version is just stupid. There isn't a choice >> between those two. There is only a choice between: use unstable or >> stable. And if you use unsta

Re: [gentoo-user] skype package changes I don't understand

2012-05-21 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/21/2012 05:10 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 08:55:25 schrieb Mark Knecht: >> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras >> > wrote: >>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht >>> wrote: I love my

Re: [gentoo-user] skype package changes I don't understand

2012-05-21 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 08:55:25 schrieb Mark Knecht: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > >> I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here? > >> skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed

Re: [gentoo-user] skype package changes I don't understand

2012-05-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: >>> I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here? >>> skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and wo

Re: [gentoo-user] skype package changes I don't understand

2012-05-21 Thread Mark Knecht
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here? >> skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and working >> fine. Today 2.2.0.35-r99 is ~amd64, which is perf

Re: [gentoo-user] skype package changes I don't understand

2012-05-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here? > skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and working > fine. Today 2.2.0.35-r99 is ~amd64, which is perfectly fine, but > they've completely removed -r1 and now I'm r

[gentoo-user] skype package changes I don't understand

2012-05-21 Thread Mark Knecht
I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here? skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and working fine. Today 2.2.0.35-r99 is ~amd64, which is perfectly fine, but they've completely removed -r1 and now I'm required to unmask emulation packages that only came out today