I see that building a kernel ends with checking for "update-grub", which I
don't have. Should I? Where does it come from?
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
On Sonntag, 14. Oktober 2007, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I see that building a kernel ends with checking for "update-grub", which I
> don't have. Should I? Where does it come from?
I don't know. I see that message too. Every single time. And so far I have had
no problems caused by the lack of it.
On 10/13/07, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Sonntag, 14. Oktober 2007, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > I see that building a kernel ends with checking for "update-grub", which
> I
> > don't have. Should I? Where does it come from?
>
> I don't know. I see that message too. Every
On Sonntag, 14. Oktober 2007, Mark Shields wrote:
> And no, you don't need it. Writing and maintaining your own menu.lst (
> grub.conf) works just fine.
well, I have a 'vmlinuz' entry and a 'vmlinuz.old' entry. Since make install
creates the proper symlinks there is no grub.conf/menu.lst editin
On 10/14/07, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Sonntag, 14. Oktober 2007, Mark Shields wrote:
>
> > And no, you don't need it. Writing and maintaining your own menu.lst (
> > grub.conf) works just fine.
>
> well, I have a 'vmlinuz' entry and a 'vmlinuz.old' entry. Since make
>
On Montag, 15. Oktober 2007, Mark Shields wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > On Sonntag, 14. Oktober 2007, Mark Shields wrote:
> > > And no, you don't need it. Writing and maintaining your own menu.lst (
> > > grub.conf) works just fine.
> >
> > well, I h
6 matches
Mail list logo
