On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:44:48 +0100
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> The profile is never changed when running updates, the user has to
> change it by using eselect or updating the make.profile symlink by
> hand. There is a bug [1] open about a profile change without user
> interaction. It seems something
2009/11/10 Arnau Bria :
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:10:08 +0100
> Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>
> [...]
>> Do you remember which profile you have used before.
> nop :-( sorry.
> when did the profile changed? cause my last update was 15/21 days ago...
>
The profile is never changed when running updates, t
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:10:08 +0100
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
[...]
> Do you remember which profile you have used before.
nop :-( sorry.
when did the profile changed? cause my last update was 15/21 days ago...
> I am asking
> because maybe it was the 2007 or 2008 profile which was depreciated
> and
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:59:00 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I don't think it is you. Alan, why is portage telling him that
> 10.0/desktop is deprecated? I'm using that profile myself with no
> problems.
It's not, it is telling him that x86/10.0 is deprecated and that he
should use x86/10.0/desktop. Howev
2009/11/10 Arnau Bria :
> my first update attempt after syncing...
>
> # emerge -uDvpt world
>
> !!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
> !!! Please upgrade to the following profile if possible:
> default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop
>
> To upgrade do the following steps
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 12:33:37 Arnau Bria wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:17:20 +0200
>
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 November 2009 12:14:13 Arnau Bria wrote:
> > > profile, from default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop to
> > > default/linux/x86/10.0. *not sure if my problem comes from cha
Arnau Bria wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:40:28 -0600
> Dale Dale wrote:
>
>
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>
>
>> I'm trying to figure out WHY he had to change it from a desktop
>> profile to a plain profile. Did the OP get told this by portage or
>> did he change the requirements for his
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:40:28 -0600
Dale Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out WHY he had to change it from a desktop
> profile to a plain profile. Did the OP get told this by portage or
> did he change the requirements for his Gentoo install? 10.0 is the
> current set of
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009 12:14:13 Arnau Bria wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> today I've sync my portage and noticed that I had to change my profile,
>> from default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/10.0.
>> *not sure if my problem comes from changing profile...
>>
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:17:20 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009 12:14:13 Arnau Bria wrote:
> > profile, from default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop to
> > default/linux/x86/10.0. *not sure if my problem comes from changing
> > profile...
>
> err, according to that you didn't change
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 12:14:13 Arnau Bria wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> today I've sync my portage and noticed that I had to change my profile,
> from default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/10.0.
> *not sure if my problem comes from changing profile...
err, according to that you didn't
Hi all,
today I've sync my portage and noticed that I had to change my profile,
from default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/10.0.
*not sure if my problem comes from changing profile...
then I did my emerge -uDvpt world and found that I had to add some use
flags to some packages:
fir
12 matches
Mail list logo
