On Wednesday 27 December 2006 15:26, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating
> (and check-for-update) stuff ?
I have absolutely no idea about what this question means...
--
Bo Andresen
pgpMFQJFyE9yS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ct: Re: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 15:26, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating
> (and check-for-update) stuff ?
I have absolutely no idea about what this question means...
--
Bo Andresen
--
gentoo-use
* Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 December 2006 15:26, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating
> > (and check-for-update) stuff ?
>
> I have absolutely no idea about what this question means...
Seamonkey has some updat
> -Original Message-
> From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 December 2006 14:26
> To: gentoo-user
> Subject: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating
> (and check-for-update) stuff ?
>
>
>
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 13:58, Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D) wrote:
> > is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating
> > (and check-for-update) stuff ?
> >
> >
> > thx
>
> emerge sync && emerge -u seamonkey
>
> That's the only way I can think of
Seamonkey (and Mozilla/Netsca
On 1/3/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 13:58, Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D) wrote:
> > is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating
> > (and check-for-update) stuff ?
> >
> >
> > thx
>
> emerge sync && emerge -u seamonkey
>
> That's the only
6 matches
Mail list logo