On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:41:45 I wrote:
> After following the "Palemoon again" thread I wanted to try Pale Moon, so
> I installed layman and added the octopus overlay. Here's a snippet from
> the build log:
--->8
> You see it couldn't even find a rule to make the object files. I tried
> setting
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:41:45 I wrote:
>
>> After following the "Palemoon again" thread I wanted to try Pale Moon, so
>> I installed layman and added the octopus overlay. Here's a snippet from
>> the build log:
> --->8
>
>> You see it couldn't even find a rule to make the o
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 02:18:16PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:41:45 I wrote:
>
> > You see it couldn't even find a rule to make the object files. I tried
> > setting MAKEOPTS="-j 1" to override the --jobs=24 that I usually have set,
> > but that just changed the logged
On April 17, 2017 2:41:45 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
>Hello list,
>
>After following the "Palemoon again" thread I wanted to try Pale Moon,
>so I
>installed layman and added the octopus overlay. Here's a snippet from
>the
>build log:
>
>Configure complete!
>Be sure to run |mach build| to
On Tuesday 18 Apr 2017 06:28:57 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I had some issues in the past (can't remember when this was) where "-j"
> was misinterpreted. I ended up using the longer version: "--jobs"
>
> This might work for you as well.
Good idea. Thanks Joost.
--
Regards
Peter
On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote:
> A couple of things to note, which also apply to building Firefox
>
> 1) When using the Palemoon overlay, I found that USE="optimize" turns
> off Gentoo's optimization, and replaces it with limited "optimization"
> by the mozconfig. If you're g
On April 18, 2017 11:06:12 AM GMT+02:00, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
>On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote:
>> A couple of things to note, which also apply to building Firefox
>>
>> 1) When using the Palemoon overlay, I found that USE="optimize" turns
>> off Gentoo's optimization, and re
On Tuesday 18 Apr 2017 09:17:24 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> If you are certain you don't have gcc in slot 5.x installed. You can add
> palemoon to /etc/portage/package.unmask
>
> That will override the package.mask from the overlay.
This looks pretty conclusive to me:
$ eix -eI gcc
[I] sys-devel/gcc
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:17:24AM +, J. Roeleveld wrote
>
> If you are certain you don't have gcc in slot 5.x installed. You
> can add palemoon to /etc/portage/package.unmask
>
> That will override the package.mask from the overlay.
For the official contributed SSE version, I build with 4
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:06:12AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote:
> >
> > 2) USE="-system-libs" is recommended. Yes, this does make the binary
> > slightly larger. But it avoids problems where changing API/ABI in the
> > system lib causes subtle p
On Thursday 20 Apr 2017 17:59:13 Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:06:12AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
>
> > On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote:
> > > 2) USE="-system-libs" is recommended. Yes, this does make the binary
> > > slightly larger. But it avoids problems wh
On 170421-07:04+0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 20 Apr 2017 17:59:13 Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:06:12AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> >
> > > On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote:
> > > > 2) USE="-system-libs" is recommended. Yes, this does make the bi
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 07:04:57AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> As I'm now on sys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r3 I'll have to assess what to
> do next. That will be after I've finished sorting out another
> problem I have.
Step #1) Rebuild your system with gcc-5.4.0
Step #2) Tweak the Octopus overlay
13 matches
Mail list logo