On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
wrote:
> On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>> Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
>> stable.
>>
>> I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons
>> (xmarks, AdBlockPlus, Noscript,
Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie Ryan
did opine thusly:
> On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> > On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> >> Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
> >> stable.
> >
> > Indeed. Bu
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie Ryan
did opine thusly:
On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
> wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>> Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
>>> stable.
>>>
>>> I got myself up to the latest, and
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> >>> Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every releas
On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick wrote:
>
> Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried Chrome
> once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I gave up on it
> because I was not sure if the browser was calling home with my browsing habits
> and if these
On 09/19/10 19:26, András Csányi wrote:
> On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick wrote:
>>
>> Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried
Chrome
>> once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I gave up
on it
>> because I was not sure if the browser was calling
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>> >>> I
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:56:36 me wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
> >> >
> >> > wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:26:56 András Csányi wrote:
> On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick wrote:
> > Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried
> > Chrome once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I
> > gave up on it because I was not sure if the
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, me wrote:
> Chrome's set of extensions is growing rather large, and at least
> contains most of what anyone would need, a bit short of 'want', but
> covers needs fairly well. If you don't like chrome's interface I'll
> not argue, but if the extensions are the one t
Lie Ryan wrote:
On 09/19/10 19:04, Dale wrote:
Yep. I use Seamonkey which is browser and email all in one. It doesn't
use much when I first start it up. The amount it accumulates as time
goes on depends on the websites I go to. If I go to sites that have a
lot of flash, pictures and gifs
12 matches
Mail list logo
