yeah, gem is okay, but portage is more proper way for our admins (((:
kashani писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 28 Jun
2011 20:33:07 +0400:
On 6/28/2011 5:00 AM, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-ad
Ok thank you!
Neil Bothwick писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 28 Jun
2011 18:03:12 +0400:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:00:46 +0400, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version
0.10.0 of
On 6/28/2011 5:00 AM, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version 0.10.0
of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-client, version
0.10.0 will be ready?
Thank you.
A
2011/6/28 Neil Bothwick :
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:00:46 +0400, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
>
>> Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
>> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version
>> 0.10.0 of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-clie
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:00:46 +0400, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
> Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version
> 0.10.0 of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-client,
> version 0.10.0 will be r
5 matches
Mail list logo