Re: Re[2]: [gentoo-user] VM Ware or not?

2008-01-30 Thread Ricardo Saffi Marques
On 1/30/08, Sergey Kobzar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are no special kernel requirements for server and workstation. Even though I put the support for Virtualization. People with processors for the Core 2 family or AMD with AM2 socket should do that. :-) -- Sergey --

Re[2]: [gentoo-user] VM Ware or not?

2008-01-29 Thread Sergey Kobzar
Hi Neil, Tuesday, January 29, 2008, 9:45:45 PM, you wrote: On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:37:22 -0200, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: We've been using VMware Server and VMware Server Console at our lab. Everything works really good. The point is that you can't use a real phisical partition of any of

Re[2]: [gentoo-user] VM Ware or not?

2008-01-29 Thread Sergey Kobzar
Hi Neil, Wednesday, January 30, 2008, 1:23:50 AM, you wrote: Exactly, and by the same token, you'll find Gentoo is unsupported whatever the kernel version. VMware Workstation is a commercial product, so the compatibility list is more do do with compatibility with their support team than the

Re[2]: [gentoo-user] VM Ware or not?

2008-01-29 Thread Sergey Kobzar
Hi Alex, Wednesday, January 30, 2008, 12:07:50 AM, you wrote: I do not know qemu yet, but I guess it may be easier to setup. You are right about the recent kernels, the vmware modules did not compile for me several times until vmware released patches. Quite annoying. But apart from that,

Re[2]: [gentoo-user] VM Ware or not?

2008-01-29 Thread Sergey Kobzar
Hi Jerry, Tuesday, January 29, 2008, 11:59:42 PM, you wrote: That and I believe the server package requires vm support in the cpu while the workstation does not. There are no special kernel requirements for server and workstation. -- Sergey -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list