[geo] Re: World’s biggest geoengineering experiment ‘violates’ UN rules? – Stoat

2012-10-16 Thread Russell Seitz
Andrew ought to have disclosed at the outset that, far from being a purely scientific experiment, this stunt is part of a long running scheme to sell dubious carbon offsets to the unwary- It took considerable reading of the earlier thread's links for Russ George as the real estate promoter

[geo] Re: World’s biggest geoengineering experiment ‘violates’ UN rules? – Stoat

2012-10-16 Thread Brad Guth
Or, we could simply do nothing except stay the mainstream status-quo course of doom and gloom that suits our redneck arrogance, greed and maintains maximum wealth and authority disparity, because the rich and powerful could honestly care less how difficult or how spendy life gets for the 99.9% rest

[geo] SRM: More with less?

2012-10-16 Thread Rau, Greg
Stratospheric aerosol particles and solar-radiation management * F. D. Pope, * P. Braesicke, * R. G. Grainger

Re: [geo] Re: Pacific iron fertilisation is 'blatant violation' of international regulations

2012-10-16 Thread Russell Seitz
Andrew might have mentioned at the outset that, far from being a purely scientific experiment, this stunt is part of a long running scheme to sell dubious carbon offsets to the unwary- It too considerable reading to identify Russ George as the promoter-- someone who's been seen- and investi

Re: [geo] Re: Pacific iron fertilisation is 'blatant violation' of international regulations

2012-10-16 Thread Russell Seitz
Today's iron fertilization 'experiment' pale in comparison to the actual emission stats of the Age of Steam. Over ten thousand ships burning several times their weigh in coal annually created a bunker coal trade reckoned in hundreds of millions of tons with an Fe content of several % or more

Re: [geo] Re: Pacific iron fertilisation is 'blatant violation' of international regulations

2012-10-16 Thread Bhaskar M V
Ken You said "I piped up and said that all ocean fertilization could be considered mariculture and that the CO2 storage could be regarded as a co-benefit, achieved knowingly but not intentionally (just as when we drive a car we knowingly heat the planet although that is not our intent)." I agree