http://www.technologyreview.com/news/544551/paris-climate-agreement-rests-on-shaky-technological-foundations/?utm_campaign=newsletters_source=newsletter-weekly-energy_medium=email_content=20151221
"Simply put, the technology for separating carbon dioxide from power-plant
emis
http://www.nature.com/news/talks-in-the-city-of-light-generate-more-heat-1.19074?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews
Talks in the city of light generate more heat
Rather than relying on far-off negative-emissions technologies, Paris
needed to deliver a low-carbon road map for today, argues Kevin Anderson.
Hi All,
Thanks for the emails on this. My thinking stems from a place where some of the
things we currently do look a lot like some proposals for geo-eng, and we don't
bat an eye, yet when these same activities are proposed for good purpose, they
are slammed. I struggle with this, and feel it
I appreciate your reasoned argument Emily but I don't think the repeated use of
this list by a few individuals to advocate for geoengineering is helpful. Such
contributions killed another useful list and are not in the spirit of academic
listserves. I agree with Alan. This list is for