Re: [geo] Report of Negative Emissions seminar

Greg and list: Again I agree mostly with all you have below. But I suggest a few more additions for this list to ponder: 1. You provide below the middle two of four summary statements. The first reads: - “Urgent need to reduce emissions. To limit warming to below

Re: [geo] Report of Negative Emissions seminar

Report bullet points:"Urgent need to increase carbon sequestration in land and forests. With only 200GtCO2 left until the global carbon budget for 1.5°C is blown, it is highly likely that therewill be a need to increase removals of CO2 from the atmosphere to limit warmingto 1.5°C or even 2°C.

[geo] Climate Engineering News Review for Week 47 of 2016

Dear Climate Engineering Group, please find below our weekly climate engineering news review. You can find daily updated climate engineering news on our news portal www.climate-engineering.eu/news.html. Thank you The Climate Engineering Editors

[geo] Report of Negative Emissions seminar

Fern (2016): Report of the seminar 'Negative Emissions' facilitated by Fern. Brussels. http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/Negative%20emissions%20seminar.pdf This seminar held in May 2016 brought key scientists together with environmental, development and human rights NGOs to

[geo] The evidence for deploying Bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) in the UK

Energy Technologies Institute (2016): The evidence for deploying Bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) in the UK. With assistance of Geraldine Newton-Cross, Dennis Gammer. Loughborough. Available online at http://www.eti.co.uk/insights/the-evidence-for-deploying-bioenergy-with-ccs- beccs-in-the-uk.

Re: [geo] Negative Emissions: Arrows in the Quiver, Life Preserver, and/or Moral Hazard?

Anderson could maintain his stance as a voice for realism while adding his voice to those calling for research into all forms of geoengineering. He could compare the cost of reducing emissions to the current cost of removing them from the atmosphere, call for a vigorous program of further