Here is a less pessimistic climate modeling project published in Nature
today (18 Sept). The authors conclude that the 1.5 degree goal is still
feasible.
http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo3031.html?foxtrotcallback=true
Here is a BBC report that includes criticism of the
Hi Andrew:
A combination of marine microalgae production and BECCS makes sense in certain
locations, and a combination of marine microalgae production and DAC makes
sense in other locations, especially arid subtropical regions. We have a
manuscript on the former that will soon be submitted.
In this instance I would define DAC as a machine based process to extract CO2
from the air. Examples would be Lackner’s and Eisenberger’s machines to do
this. There would be very good economic drivers to not tie this to electricity
generation and to simply use the reactor to just generate heat