this Nature paper is available open source. Their argument is worth
making but it barely mentions DACS (once) and is really a continuation of
Kevin Andersons argument about the use of CDR in models being a way of
avoiding the otherwise large necessary reductions in emissions.
Unfortunately t
This is also relevant to SRM, as SST affects dissolution
A
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Greg Rau"
Date: 5 Jan 2018 01:28
Subject: [CDR] Optimal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Face of Ocean Carbon Sink
Feedback
To: "Carbon Dioxide Removal"
Cc:
> http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/2
Unfortunatly this paper cannot be printed or downloaded!
-- Originalnachricht --
Von: "Leon Di Marco"
An: "geoengineering"
Gesendet: 05.01.2018 02:19:27
Betreff: [geo] Re: [CDR] Open discussion of negative emissions is
urgently needed | Nature Energy
this Nature paper is available op
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.
