You might also check the HOx levels and impact on HCFCs. See Oltman and
Hurst NOAA for water vapor. Has JPLCal Tech looked at this?
On 11/15/2018 3:32 PM, Douglas MacMartin wrote:
Oliver – do you think SOCOL has an error in its H2O concentrations?
As long as they have the right values in th
Oliver – do you think SOCOL has an error in its H2O concentrations? As long as
they have the right values in the model, then the effect should be taken into
account already.
From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Andrew Lockley
Sent: Thursda
That's not necessarily true. By the time CE is rolled out, we could be
looking at significantly more methane in the atmosphere, due to permafrost.
Much ultimately ends up as strat H2O.
I vaguely remember more tropospheric folding, too, which also transports
water up. Can't remember the reference,
Water in the high lat strat is limiting particle growth. H2O is in the
ppm range. See Hamil, Steele, Toon and Turco's work 1970-2000.
On 11/15/2018 1:51 PM, Andrew Lockley wrote:
https://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/acp-2018-1070/
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is
https://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/acp-2018-1070/
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for
the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Exploring accumulation-mode-H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate
geoengineering in a sectional aeroso
