, should the worst-case scenarios
materialize.
Best,
Holly Buck
Holly Jean Buck / 410.227.3316 (home) / holly.jean.b...@gmail.com
Note: The opinions expressed are personal and do not represent the views of
any institutions or organizations of affiliation.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:28 PM
ree in
> English, and has worked in teaching writing, journalism, science education,
> and radar mapping. Her research interests include the political economy of
> oil, geographies of financialization, narratives of modernity, and
> representations of climate engineering in the media
e to express a concern for what
> might happen in Lima.
>
>8. I liked your papers because they have many new ideas, are well
> thought out, and are getting at these issues of public participation, fully
> in the context of this list's (quite different SRM and CDR) inter
bject: *Re: [geo] HOME/ETC Group Targets IPCC
>
> "Strategies shouldn't be assessed on their ability to modify the
> temperature, as the temperature isn't really our problem."
>
> Tell that to the ice.
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Holly Buck
Hi Michael,
Thanks for all your useful comments; there is a lot I want to address about
them.
- Michael writes: "I would also like to comment on your statement; *"I
see our root problems as poor land use, socio-economic systems that depend
on fossil-fuel combustion, and uneven developme
uot;CO2
>> mitigation", etc and let the evaluation of socio-ecological risks and
>> benefits be based on the specific actions I'm proposing, and not biased by
>> the real or imagined risk/benefit of some totally different approach like
>> SRM.
>>
>> Greg
>
raided HSRC's offices to seize evidence.
> (HSRC disputes Environment Canada's legal interpretation)
>
> I also somewhat disagree with you characterisation of ETC Group's role - but
> I realise that you are just reporting Josh Hortons point of view. We would
> have b
