PS to last
Hello Eric,
Many apologies for my post-midnight slips.
Although I think the the difference in costs between the 2 systems is not
as important as the fact that both systems are extremely inexpensive , my
long-standing collaborator Stephen Salter has conducted careful &
comprehensive cost
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Dr D wrote:
> I've watch the recent Cafe Scientifique videos on aerosol SRM and MCB. And
> I've read dozens of articles on both. But I've yet to see a comparison of
> the two approaches? Can anyone point me to a paper comparing the two
> approaches (MCB v. strato
See eg recent NAS report, Royal Society geoengineering the climate, and Tim
Lenton review of geoengineering technologies.
Likely there are others that I can't currently recall.
A
On 31 May 2015 22:16, "Dr D" wrote:
> I've watch the recent Cafe Scientifique videos on aerosol SRM and MCB. And
> I
I've watch the recent Cafe Scientifique videos on aerosol SRM and MCB. And
I've read dozens of articles on both. But I've yet to see a comparison of
the two approaches? Can anyone point me to a paper comparing the two
approaches (MCB v. stratospheric injection of aerosol)? Many thanks.
Eric Dur
