: [geo] Exploring accumulation-mode-H2SO4 versus SO2
stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional
aerosol-chemistry-climate model
That's not necessarily true. By the time CE is rolled out, we could be
looking at significantly more methane in the atmosphere, due to
permafrost.
: Thursday, November 15, 2018 5:06 PM
To: oliver.wingen...@nmt.edu; geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [geo] Exploring accumulation-mode-H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric
sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol-chemistry-climate model
That's not necessarily true. By the time CE is rolle
That's not necessarily true. By the time CE is rolled out, we could be
looking at significantly more methane in the atmosphere, due to permafrost.
Much ultimately ends up as strat H2O.
I vaguely remember more tropospheric folding, too, which also transports
water up. Can't remember the reference,
Water in the high lat strat is limiting particle growth. H2O is in the
ppm range. See Hamil, Steele, Toon and Turco's work 1970-2000.
On 11/15/2018 1:51 PM, Andrew Lockley wrote:
https://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/acp-2018-1070/
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is
https://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/acp-2018-1070/
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for
the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Exploring accumulation-mode-H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate
geoengineering in a sectional aeroso
