subject:"\[geo\] Re\: Geoengineering \| Giving What We Can"

Re: [geo] Re: Geoengineering | Giving What We Can

2012-12-13 Thread Bickel

Check the list again. "Increased Funding for Green Energy R&D" was 17th. Also, the 2009 Copenhagen Consensus focused specifically on climate (http://fixtheclimate.com/component-1/the-result-prioritization/). In this case, the panel had $250 billion per for 10 years and ranked energy R&D 2nd. E

Re: [geo] Re: Geoengineering | Giving What We Can

2012-12-12 Thread Andrew Lockley

Unpleasant or deluded people give lots of money to good causes. If deniers and right wing crazies want to fund legitimate climate science, why not pitch for their money? A On Dec 12, 2012 10:55 AM, "David Lewis" wrote: > the site in question ("Giving What We Can") has a Climate Change > page<

[geo] Re: Geoengineering | Giving What We Can

2012-12-12 Thread David Lewis

the site in question ("Giving What We Can") has a Climate Change page which refers its visitors to Bjorn Lomborg's "Copenhagen Consensus 2012" websitewhen expl