Re: [geo] Re: Why exclusive focus on Sulphur?

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Hayes
Andrew, Sorry for this second post, typos have been repaired. On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Michael Hayes wrote: > Dr. Latham et al., > > After you submitted the HydeTellerWood paper last year, it did change many > of my concepts. > > I have been working upon a possible list of concept criter

Re: [geo] Re: Why exclusive focus on Sulphur?

2012-03-23 Thread Oliver Wingenter
ing@googlegroups.com; s.sal...@ed.ac.uk Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Why exclusive focus on Sulphur? Dr. Latham et al., After you submitted the HydeTellerWood paper last year, it did change many of my concepts. I have been working upon a possible concept criteria which could guide current and futur

RE: [geo] Re: Why exclusive focus on Sulphur?

2012-03-23 Thread John Latham
23, 2012 9:21 PM To: kcalde...@gmail.com Cc: John Latham; geoengineering@googlegroups.com; s.sal...@ed.ac.uk Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Why exclusive focus on Sulphur? Dr. Latham et al., After you submitted the HydeTellerWood paper last year, it did change many of my concepts. I have been working upo

[geo] Re: Why exclusive focus on Sulphur?

2012-03-21 Thread Ken Caldeira
I think there have been two main reasons for focus on sulfur, at least for the stratosphere: 1. It can be released as a gas (SO2 or H2S) that can then oxidize to form particles of approximately the right size, greatly reducing problems of dispersion upon release. 2. Volcanoes did it and it worked