ey, I am forwarding this to the whole
>> group.
>>
>> ------ Forwarded message --
>> From: Dr. Adrian Tuck
>> Date: 14 November 2013 05:58
>> Subject: Re: [geo] Sulphur injection regime - request for comments
>> To: Andrew Lockley
>> Cc: Jam
---
From: "Keith Henson"
To: "dr adrian tuck"
Cc: "geoengineering" < >, "James Donaldson" , "Matt
Hitchman" , "Erik Richard" ,
"Heikki Tervahattu" , "Veronica Vaida"
, "Chuck Wilson"
Sent: Thur
05:58
> Subject: Re: [geo] Sulphur injection regime - request for comments
> To: Andrew Lockley
> Cc: James Donaldson , Matt Hitchman
> , Erik Richard , Heikki
> Tervahattu , Veronica Vaida
> , Chuck Wilson
>
>
> [1] The PALMS initial results in 1998 destroyed the belief l
At the suggestion of Andrew Lockley, I am forwarding this to the whole
group.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dr. Adrian Tuck
Date: 14 November 2013 05:58
Subject: Re: [geo] Sulphur injection regime - request for comments
To: Andrew Lockley
Cc: James Donaldson , Matt Hitchman <
Hi
I'm drafting a paper on the use of guns. A great deal of design
considerations hinge on whether to use condensing vapors (e.g. SO3), or
reactive gases (SO2, H2S). The former seem to dislike local saturation, and
the latter seem to prefer it (unless I'm missing something).
Is there currently a
