m] RE: [geo] The problem with stratospheric SRM
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 07:21:48 +0100
Thanks for the support, but I now think any thought
of commercial fight use is just wildly premature at the moment.
For now we need to concentrate on the practical,
one off, development of the wa
...@nmt.edu ; Climateintervention FIPC
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 3:24 PM
Subject: RE: [clim] RE: [geo] The problem with stratospheric SRM
Note that Gorman has proposed direct formation of silicates in commercial
aircraft exhaust, following earlier suggestions of sulfur in jet
ps.com] On Behalf Of Oliver Wingenter
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 7:39 PM
To: kcalde...@stanford.edu
Cc: Ken Caldeira; joshuahorton...@gmail.com; geoengineering; Wingenter
Subject: [geo] The problem with stratospheric SRM
Dear Ken,
The problem is after the initial injections
[clim] RE: [geo] The problem with stratospheric SRM
A few comments on microphysics of stratospheric aerosols.
We have examine the microphysics in a recent GRL paper. We confirmed earlier
findings that the standard SO2 injection can be surprisingly ineffective
because most of the sulf
Dear Ken,
The problem is after the initial injections, i.e. the second yea of GE,
can we even create new particles with a background now 15 to 25 times
higher with or with out nucleation sites? Under the present sulfate
schemes it appears not. in order to "tune in" particle size and number
