Re: FW: [geo] ethics-the responsibility of the editors, reviewer or papers opposing climate engineering

2009-11-19 Thread Ken Caldeira
nt: Thursday, November 19, 2009 8:54 AM > To: 'oliver.wingen...@gmail.com' > Subject: RE: [geo] ethics-the responsibility of the editors, reviewer or > papers opposing climate engineering > > Oliver Wingenter: > > Thank you. Of course your closing sentence is totally corr

FW: [geo] ethics-the responsibility of the editors, reviewer or papers opposing climate engineering

2009-11-19 Thread Eugene I. Gordon
-Original Message- From: Eugene I. Gordon [mailto:euggor...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 8:54 AM To: 'oliver.wingen...@gmail.com' Subject: RE: [geo] ethics-the responsibility of the editors, reviewer or papers opposing climate engineering Oliver Wingenter:

[geo] ethics-the responsibility of the editors, reviewer or papers opposing climate engineering

2009-11-18 Thread Oliver Wingenter
Dear Group, When the topic of ethics in climate engineering is brought up it is usually posed as a responsibility only of the climate engineer. I would like to open the discussion to the responsibilities of journal editors, reviewers, and those that publish papers attempting to derail possibly go