ubject: Re: [geo] Can we have it both ways? On potential trade-offs between
Mitigation and Solar Radiation Management | Baatz
Dear Doug, dear list,
I would like to briefly come back on Doug's post on my paper (I was on holidays
and then very busy, hence the delay; sorry for this).
Ad i) Yes
Dear Doug, dear list,
I would like to briefly come back on Doug's post on my paper (I was on
holidays and then very busy, hence the delay; sorry for this).
Ad i) Yes, more research may make it harder for uninformed
decision-makers to have a naively optimistic view of SRM. But there are
plent
Hi All
I would prefer NOT do geoengineering because the mitigation people were
doing a such a great job that it was not needed. Check out Keeling to
see how they have been getting on.
However a more likely outcome is that we cannot do geoengineering
because the funding for hardware developme
Didn’t read quite as carefully as I could, but two quick comments:
i) the assumption in extending the argument to research is that
more research increases the likelihood of SRM being used as an excuse not to
mitigate; I suspect that is unfounded. That is, more research may make
