I stand by the heading for the following reasons:
1. The title is loosely based on this title from TechDirt: Bill Gates'
New Career? Patent Troll For Nathan
Myhrvold?http://www.techdirt.com/blog/?company=searete and
this on from The Guardian: The man who would stop hurricanes with car
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 August 2013 05:38
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.commailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Cc: John Latham; rez...@gmail.commailto:rez...@gmail.com;
kcalde...@carnegiescience.edumailto:kcalde...@carnegiescience.edu
Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Playing God With the Planet - The Ethics
: Re: [geo] Re: Playing God With the Planet - The Ethics
Politics of Geoengineering
I stand by the heading for the following reasons:
1. The title is loosely based on this title from TechDirt: Bill Gates'
New Career? Patent Troll For Nathan Myhrvold?
http://www.techdirt.com/blog/?company
a
universal solution and minimizes the politics.
From: Jim Lee rez...@gmail.com
To: geoengi...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 10:21:27 PM
Subject: [geo] Re: Playing God With the Planet - The Ethics Politics of
Geoengineering
As you could clearly
From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
on behalf of Jim Lee [rez...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 August 2013 00:10
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Cc: rez...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Playing God With the Planet - The Ethics Politics
of Geoengineering
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 10:21:27 PM
Subject: [geo] Re: Playing God With the Planet - The Ethics Politics of
Geoengineering
As you could clearly see, my video comment was in response to a low
information voter and I agree with Mick's response.
Geoengineering seeks to do
I believe Jim is referring to the following invitation to consider
guidance from COP 10 (2010), frequently misinterpreted as a ban.
http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/default.shtml?id=12299
COP 10 Decision X/33
X/33.Biodiversity and climate change
The Conference of the Parties,
...
8.*Invites*
