Hello Andrew,

The development of lectric fields in thunderstorms is produced by the 
rebounding 
collisions of ice crystals with small hail (graupel) in the presence of 
supercooled water droplets.To produce
appreciable lightning significant atmospheric instability is required and the 
clouds need 
to be at least 3 or 4 Km deep, with cloud-top temperature colder tharn -20C. 
Updraught
speeds of at least 6-10m/s are required , and are often much greater.The amount 
of energy
involved is prodigious. The only possible route to change thunderstorm activity 
that I am
aware of is to over-seed them with ice-forming particles - silver iodide the 
best known 
material - so that hail formation is suppressed (thus associated hail damage), 
with a 
reduction of lightning activity, which I think is not what you want.

Basically, I feel that thunderstorms are too energetic and localised for 
significant 
modification. In my view the same is true for hurricanes. Far better, in the 
latter
case, to use some scheme for cooling the surface waters in regions where 
hurricanes form(via 
Marine Cloud Brighteing (see AGU poster) or the Seitz microbubble approach).in 
order to
weaken the hurricane development.

Cheers,    John.      lat...@ucar.edu  

John Latham
Address: P.O. Box 3000,MMM,NCAR,Boulder,CO 80307-3000
Email: lat...@ucar.edu  or john.latha...@manchester.ac.uk
Tel: (US-Work) 303-497-8182 or (US-Home) 303-444-2429
 or   (US-Cell)   303-882-0724  or (UK) 01928-730-002
http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/people/latham
________________________________________
From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [geoengineering@googlegroups.com] on 
behalf of Andrew Lockley [andrew.lock...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 8:00 AM
To: geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Thunder and lightning

Lightning creates NOx which degrades methane.  It's a major source of natural 
NOx, I'm advised.  This is likely climate  significant, although I don't have 
figures.

Thunderstorms also redistribute heat and moisture, although I'm not sure if 
either is significant.

We've looked at killing hurricanes. Could we use a similar but reverse approach 
to make thunderstorms?

A

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to