Paul,
Thanks for the response. Going with the flow is certainly preferable,
but I'd rather avoid bugs down the road if I can. After looking at the
bug tracker, it looks like there are quite a few major/critical bugs
that were fixed in 3.0. Is it only those bugs with 2.2.x specified as
the
Mike,
The significance of the changes is all in your perception and use. If
you happen to hit a geometry bug in 2.2, then 3.0 becomes much more
significant to you.
I'd suggest "going with the flow". Use what you have as default until
such a time as it doesn't do what you want or need.
P
Mike,
If Fedora 8 doesn't have it, then I'm pretty sure CentOS won't either,
as it's repackaged from Red Hat, which is in turn behind Fedora Core
in terms of available packages. In fact, I have access to a CentOS
server and can't find *any* version of GEOS via default yum listing.
I had
Hello List,
I'm setting up a new server that in the not-too-distant future will be
used for some live project work. I'm currently running Fedora 8, and I
find that most of the GIS-related utilities we need are available from
the default Fedora repositories. However, the Geos in the Fedora
r
